<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gun owners more likely to be shot than non-gun owners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technoccult.net/archives/2009/11/03/gun-owners-more-likely-to-be-shot-than-non-gun-owners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technoccult.net/archives/2009/11/03/gun-owners-more-likely-to-be-shot-than-non-gun-owners/</link>
	<description>A General Interest Blog for Weirdos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:22:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GoldCountryFNRA (Gold Country FNRA)</title>
		<link>http://technoccult.net/archives/2009/11/03/gun-owners-more-likely-to-be-shot-than-non-gun-owners/comment-page-1/#comment-328025</link>
		<dc:creator>GoldCountryFNRA (Gold Country FNRA)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mutateweb.com/?p=8448#comment-328025</guid>
		<description>Gun owners more likely to be shot than non-gun owners &#124; Mutate! http://tinyurl.com/yjm3npn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gun owners more likely to be shot than non-gun owners | Mutate! <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yjm3npn" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yjm3npn</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://technoccult.net/archives/2009/11/03/gun-owners-more-likely-to-be-shot-than-non-gun-owners/comment-page-1/#comment-328009</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 05:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mutateweb.com/?p=8448#comment-328009</guid>
		<description>The &quot;science&quot; on this &quot;study&quot; was horrible. They called people who had been victims of violent crime and asked them if they had a gun when the crime occurred. Hmm... do you think people who have been victims of violent crime are likely to tell the truth to a stranger over the phone about whether they own a gun? I guarantee you that if somebody calls me up in that situation, I&#039;m not telling them squat.

Also, there&#039;s the causality question. Here&#039;s a quote from an article on the study:

&lt;i&gt;Criminologist Gary Kleck of Florida State University said the Penn results can be explained by the fact that people who are at risk of being shot are also more likely to buy or carry guns. Such people might have dangerous jobs or belong to a street gang or be involved in the illicit drug trade, for example.

In an e-mail, Kleck explained his view with an analogy. &quot;It is precisely as if medical researchers found that insulin use is more common among persons who suffer from diabetes than among those who are not diabetic (something that is most assuredly true), and concluded that insulin use raises one&#039;s risk of diabetes.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;science&#8221; on this &#8220;study&#8221; was horrible. They called people who had been victims of violent crime and asked them if they had a gun when the crime occurred. Hmm&#8230; do you think people who have been victims of violent crime are likely to tell the truth to a stranger over the phone about whether they own a gun? I guarantee you that if somebody calls me up in that situation, I&#8217;m not telling them squat.</p>
<p>Also, there&#8217;s the causality question. Here&#8217;s a quote from an article on the study:</p>
<p><i>Criminologist Gary Kleck of Florida State University said the Penn results can be explained by the fact that people who are at risk of being shot are also more likely to buy or carry guns. Such people might have dangerous jobs or belong to a street gang or be involved in the illicit drug trade, for example.</p>
<p>In an e-mail, Kleck explained his view with an analogy. &#8220;It is precisely as if medical researchers found that insulin use is more common among persons who suffer from diabetes than among those who are not diabetic (something that is most assuredly true), and concluded that insulin use raises one&#8217;s risk of diabetes.&#8221;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
