<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: South Korea also crowd sourcing intelligence &#8211; via game</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technoccult.net/archives/2009/06/30/south-korea-crowd-sourcing-intelligence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technoccult.net/archives/2009/06/30/south-korea-crowd-sourcing-intelligence/</link>
	<description>A General Interest Blog for Weirdos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:52:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Klint Finley</title>
		<link>http://technoccult.net/archives/2009/06/30/south-korea-crowd-sourcing-intelligence/comment-page-1/#comment-308737</link>
		<dc:creator>Klint Finley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://renegadefuturist.com/?p=7379#comment-308737</guid>
		<description>Yes, that is the hope, and we&#039;re seeing it gradually start to happen (so far mostly to cops, not to politicians who have been snared by citizen surveillance).

&quot;Little Brother&quot; also has one big advantage over Big Brother: we know precisely who we need to surveill. One of the biggest problems for &quot;Big Brother&quot; is the signal to noise ratio involved in trying to watch the entire population. We only have to watch the powerful - a much smaller data set.

http://www.wired.com/politics/security/commentary/securitymatters/2006/03/70357</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that is the hope, and we&#8217;re seeing it gradually start to happen (so far mostly to cops, not to politicians who have been snared by citizen surveillance).</p>
<p>&#8220;Little Brother&#8221; also has one big advantage over Big Brother: we know precisely who we need to surveill. One of the biggest problems for &#8220;Big Brother&#8221; is the signal to noise ratio involved in trying to watch the entire population. We only have to watch the powerful &#8211; a much smaller data set.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/politics/security/commentary/securitymatters/2006/03/70357" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/politics/security/commentary/securitymatters/2006/03/70357</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor Blake</title>
		<link>http://technoccult.net/archives/2009/06/30/south-korea-crowd-sourcing-intelligence/comment-page-1/#comment-308523</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 01:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://renegadefuturist.com/?p=7379#comment-308523</guid>
		<description>Unspoken is the counter-game.  If the CIA were to publish their data, I&#039;d know how to play that counter-game right away.  The hope (not at all inevitable, but a hope) with the surveillance state is that citizens get more/equal access to the data and help keep the powers that be in line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unspoken is the counter-game.  If the CIA were to publish their data, I&#8217;d know how to play that counter-game right away.  The hope (not at all inevitable, but a hope) with the surveillance state is that citizens get more/equal access to the data and help keep the powers that be in line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
