Comments on: Michael Jackson: Man of Tomorrow http://technoccult.net/archives/2009/06/29/michael-jackson-man-of-tomorrow/ A General Interest Blog for Weirdos Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:52:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Nick Hate http://technoccult.net/archives/2009/06/29/michael-jackson-man-of-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-308149 Nick Hate Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:21:22 +0000 http://renegadefuturist.com/?p=7367#comment-308149 Honestly? This is the worst kind of pomo pap. Michael Jackson isn't white, a woman, or a child. He was a grown Black man with feminine qualities and a taste for eight year old cock- "allegedly" of course. This article seems to be little more than an excellent example of the failings and shortcomings of pomo idiocy once the world is confronted with REAL FUCKING PROBLEMS. Honestly?

This is the worst kind of pomo pap. Michael Jackson isn’t white, a woman, or a child. He was a grown Black man with feminine qualities and a taste for eight year old cock- “allegedly” of course. This article seems to be little more than an excellent example of the failings and shortcomings of pomo idiocy once the world is confronted with REAL FUCKING PROBLEMS.

]]> By: NecroPsyChroNauTron http://technoccult.net/archives/2009/06/29/michael-jackson-man-of-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-308139 NecroPsyChroNauTron Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:13:26 +0000 http://renegadefuturist.com/?p=7367#comment-308139 Okay, so maybe you could string it that way. But I hardly think Michael Jackson fills the image for what I am thinking people will become/are becoming. Figuratively, I suppose he could be a meagerly adequate device to illustrate the point of the article, but I think the real life execution would be much less sideshow-esque and fractured. Also, he's what all people will become? Or the rich and privledged? I mean, as far as I know, someone still has to work the land to produce basic sustenance resources. Okay, so maybe you could string it that way.
But I hardly think Michael Jackson fills the image for what I am thinking people will become/are becoming.
Figuratively, I suppose he could be a meagerly adequate device to illustrate the point of the article, but I think the real life execution would be much less sideshow-esque and fractured.
Also, he’s what all people will become? Or the rich and privledged?
I mean, as far as I know, someone still has to work the land to produce basic sustenance resources.

]]> By: Bill Whitcomb http://technoccult.net/archives/2009/06/29/michael-jackson-man-of-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-308103 Bill Whitcomb Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:11:15 +0000 http://renegadefuturist.com/?p=7367#comment-308103 Given long enough, we'll all be like Michael, though not in the way the article means. "He’s alive, but only in theory." I think there's a testable hypothesis here. Given long enough, we’ll all be like Michael, though not in the way the article means. “He’s alive, but only in theory.” I think there’s a testable hypothesis here.

]]>