Comments on: Zero-G makes all but 4 sex-positions impossible http://technoccult.net/archives/2007/12/06/zero-g-makes-all-but-4-sex-positions-impossible/ A General Interest Blog for Weirdos Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:11:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Elisha Grey http://technoccult.net/archives/2007/12/06/zero-g-makes-all-but-4-sex-positions-impossible/comment-page-1/#comment-107620 Elisha Grey Sat, 08 Dec 2007 03:19:29 +0000 http://www.technoccult.com/archives/2007/12/06/zero-g-makes-all-but-4-sex-positions-impossible/#comment-107620 Birds do it Bees do it Even Cosmonauts up in Mir do it Lets do it Lets have sex in space Birds do it
Bees do it
Even Cosmonauts up in Mir do it
Lets do it
Lets have sex in space

]]> By: chaoflux http://technoccult.net/archives/2007/12/06/zero-g-makes-all-but-4-sex-positions-impossible/comment-page-1/#comment-107570 chaoflux Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:03:56 +0000 http://www.technoccult.com/archives/2007/12/06/zero-g-makes-all-but-4-sex-positions-impossible/#comment-107570 When is the last time you saw a sexy astronaut? They could be protecting you for a reason you know :P Although, I would love to see how Zero-G bukkake worked out, strictly to further my research. When is the last time you saw a sexy astronaut?

They could be protecting you for a reason you know :P

Although, I would love to see how Zero-G bukkake worked out, strictly to further my research.

]]> By: wes http://technoccult.net/archives/2007/12/06/zero-g-makes-all-but-4-sex-positions-impossible/comment-page-1/#comment-107554 wes Fri, 07 Dec 2007 21:03:25 +0000 http://www.technoccult.com/archives/2007/12/06/zero-g-makes-all-but-4-sex-positions-impossible/#comment-107554 this thread is worthless without pics "The results were videotaped but are considered so sensitive that even Nasa was only given a censored version" anyone else bothered by this statement? this thread is worthless without pics

“The results were videotaped but are considered so sensitive that even Nasa was only given a censored version”

anyone else bothered by this statement?

]]>