Comments on: Erik Davis on Deleuze and Guattari http://technoccult.net/archives/2006/09/06/erik-davis-on-deleuze-and-guattari/ Mutate Your Mind Tue, 07 Sep 2010 23:11:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc By: Klintron http://technoccult.net/archives/2006/09/06/erik-davis-on-deleuze-and-guattari/comment-page-1/#comment-179572 Klintron Wed, 27 Aug 2008 23:21:34 +0000 http://www.technoccult.com/archives/2006/09/06/erik-davis-on-deleuze-and-guattari/#comment-179572 Davis holds forth at length on this topic here: http://www.techgnosis.com/chunkshow-single.php?chunk=chunkfrom-2006-01-21-1538-0.txt Davis holds forth at length on this topic here: http://www.techgnosis.com/chunkshow-single.php?chunk=chunkfrom-2006-01-21-1538-0.txt

]]> By: khephret http://technoccult.net/archives/2006/09/06/erik-davis-on-deleuze-and-guattari/comment-page-1/#comment-171044 khephret Mon, 18 Aug 2008 04:33:35 +0000 http://www.technoccult.com/archives/2006/09/06/erik-davis-on-deleuze-and-guattari/#comment-171044 You know.... I've been reading and re-reading Mille Plateaux and working through it for a long time. I have to agree that the BwO always made more sense to me in a truly energetic sense (I have been wont to describe it in more Castanedan terms as the luminous egg Don Juan described so many times) and I'm glad to see I'm not the only person who made this connection. I'm glad to find others who are taking this extraordinary work and reading it the way that I feel it was originally intended. Too many philosophy students have read it to death, not allowing it the freedom to unfold in their minds like the wild soundtrack to unhinged thought it was no doubt meant to be. -k. You know….

I’ve been reading and re-reading Mille Plateaux and working through it for a long time. I have to agree that the BwO always made more sense to me in a truly energetic sense (I have been wont to describe it in more Castanedan terms as the luminous egg Don Juan described so many times) and I’m glad to see I’m not the only person who made this connection.
I’m glad to find others who are taking this extraordinary work and reading it the way that I feel it was originally intended. Too many philosophy students have read it to death, not allowing it the freedom to unfold in their minds like the wild soundtrack to unhinged thought it was no doubt meant to be.

-k.

]]> By: clifford duffy http://technoccult.net/archives/2006/09/06/erik-davis-on-deleuze-and-guattari/comment-page-1/#comment-24002 clifford duffy Sat, 14 Oct 2006 06:52:12 +0000 http://www.technoccult.com/archives/2006/09/06/erik-davis-on-deleuze-and-guattari/#comment-24002 This blog space yet another chunk, a bloc.. of the Fictions Jill, Franny, and Mona, a poetic..blogography of Deleuze and Guattari. The space of epistolary becomings,the chaosmosis of prose poetry. OnE ThoUsAnD BlOgss ~ William D and Mona G This blog is consisting of all sorts of platos and plaketoes. It has no shaken artisticaristotle in its throttle. Rent free dynamism. Text & some Images of this Blog?copyright 2004,5,6 Clifford Duffy. This blog space yet another chunk, a bloc.. of the Fictions Jill, Franny, and Mona, a poetic..blogography of Deleuze and Guattari. The space of epistolary becomings,the chaosmosis of prose poetry. OnE ThoUsAnD BlOgss ~ William D and Mona G This blog is consisting of all sorts of platos and plaketoes. It has no shaken artisticaristotle in its throttle. Rent free dynamism. Text & some Images of this Blog?copyright 2004,5,6 Clifford Duffy.

]]> By: fenris23 http://technoccult.net/archives/2006/09/06/erik-davis-on-deleuze-and-guattari/comment-page-1/#comment-22295 fenris23 Sun, 10 Sep 2006 06:57:18 +0000 http://www.technoccult.com/archives/2006/09/06/erik-davis-on-deleuze-and-guattari/#comment-22295 <a href="http://fenris23.wordpress.com/2006/09/10/drifting-with-deleuze/" rel="nofollow">Drifting with Deleuze</a>, Just for you. Drifting with Deleuze, Just for you.

]]> By: fenris23 http://technoccult.net/archives/2006/09/06/erik-davis-on-deleuze-and-guattari/comment-page-1/#comment-22241 fenris23 Sat, 09 Sep 2006 01:19:25 +0000 http://www.technoccult.com/archives/2006/09/06/erik-davis-on-deleuze-and-guattari/#comment-22241 Actually they do refer to the BwO as a Tantric egg. Now I need to re-read this. Thanks a lot. :P Actually they do refer to the BwO as a Tantric egg. Now I need to re-read this. Thanks a lot. :P

]]>