MonthOctober 2007

“I really regret it. I really regret having children”

She regrets having children. And, more so, she has decided that other women ought not to have them, if they know what is good for themselves and for the world. After 13 years of maternal humiliations, she wrote a quick, funny, angry book.

Everywhere you look in France these days, you seem to see its cover: The words NO KID in English, followed by “40 Reasons for Not Having Children” in French. It is a huge bestseller. Her 40 reasons are often funny and personal (“Don’t become a travelling feeding bottle,” “don’t adopt the idiot-language of children”) sometimes bitter (“you will inevitably be disappointed with your child”) and often designed to puncture the idealized notion of motherhood that poisons Western societies.

It is a combination of tart sisterly advice (“What hope is there of having a fulfilling sex life when a woman is forced to turn into a fat, deformed animal decked out in sack-like dresses?”) with shock-tactic social analysis (“More murders and child abuse happen within families than outside them. Every family is a nest of vipers – all the reason not to add to your own”).

Such notions, in France today, are almost unthinkable. It is a country overtaken with what Ms. Maier calls “baby mania.”

Full Story: The Globe and Mail.

See also: Times Online.

(via American Samizdat).

Now here’s how to make a union ad

Industrial America

The United States makes more manufactured goods today than at any time in history, as measured by the dollar value of production adjusted for inflation — three times as much as in the mid-1950s, the supposed heyday of American industry. Between 1977 and 2005, the value of American manufacturing swelled from $1.3 trillion to an all-time record $4.5 trillion, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

With less than 5 percent of the world’s population, the United States is responsible for almost one-fourth of global manufacturing, a share that has changed little in decades. The United States is the largest manufacturing economy by far. Japan, the only serious rival for that title, has been losing ground. China has been growing but represents only about one-tenth of world manufacturing.

[…]

Throughout the state, and indeed the nation, laid-off factory workers are typically able to find new jobs but mostly for lower pay. A June 2002 study published by the North Carolina Justice and Community Development Center found that workers who lost manufacturing jobs in 1999 and 2000 were earning 72 percent of their previous salaries six months later.

What can we learn from this? For starters, American jobs are not so much disappearing overseas, and the US is not moving away from being an industrial economy. The disappearance of US manufacturing jobs appears to have more to do with technological progress than outsourcing (though outsourcing does play role).

However, many (most?) workers are being left behind by technological progress. I’d put at least some of the blame on the education system, and ranted about it a few years ago.

Web writer faces obscenity charges for publishing stories

Regina Lynn says: “A writer whose stories include graphic depictions of the sexual abuse and murder of children is being charged with violating obscenity statutes, even though she only posted text and not pictures to her website.”

Full Story: Tacoma Tribune.

(via Regina Lynn).

The Democratic presidential primary is this year’s general election

It may surprise some readers of this blog to learn that I’ve actually been considering registering as a Republican so I can vote for Ron Paul in the primary. I’m not a Ron Paul supporter at all, as I’ve detailed here exhaustively in the past, but I’m still happy to see him shaking up the Republican debates and bringing up issues that no one on the right or left is bringing up. And of course I would love to see the GOP tear itself apart, as I see completely marginalizing the Republicans as necessary for any sort of meaningful progress in this country (see Abe on the subject).

But seeing how well all the Democratic candidates are doing in early polling against their Republican counter-parts, it looks like a Democratic victory in 2008 is likely no matter who the candidate is. Take a look through Election Central’s Poll Tracker and pay attention to states like Virginia, that are trending Democrat. Victory is far from certain, and anything can happen between now and November of 2008. But with the current president still polling in the in 30-something percent range, and the fact that most voters still don’t know much about Giuliani (conservatives still don’t know he’s pro-choice, and not much has yet been made of his marriage scandals) or the other candidates (Romney’s Mormonism remains relatively unexplored, McCain’s age and health still surprise people), it’s hard not to bet on a Democratic candidate. It’s unlikely anyone’s going to dig up anything new about Clinton or Edwards since they’ve already been through the national scrutiny of a presidential election. Obama and Richardson are more vulnerable in that area. But the right wing noise machine’s been digging on Obama and nothing much as come up. Richardson has some skeletons in his closet (Wen Ho Lee scandal, and possibly some womanizing), but he has cross-over appeal to Republicans and Independents that could probably make up for it.

So in other words, the next president will probably be chosen in the Democratic party primaries, not the general election. Since blanket primaries don’t exist anymore, you’ve got to pick one primary or the other. In other words, if you don’t want to see 4-8 years of Hillary Clinton in the oval office, you’re best off registering as a Democrat this time around.

Of course, all of this is academic for me since Oregon’s primary is the second to last and the race will be decided by then.

Buddhism Is Not a Democracy Movement

Kerry Howley on Hit and Run:

Ian Buruma has a Sunday L.A. Times piece boldly asserting that while religious devotion can sometimes provoke violence, it can also “be a force for good.” Exhibit A is the Burmese monk protest. I’m not going to quibble with the sentiment, but using Burmese monks as proof of religion’s awesome power to do good is really, really weird.

The State Peace and Development Council derives its legitimacy from public support for Buddhism, and in recent years has leaned even more heavily on approving pronouncements from prominent religious officials. Theravada Buddhism is the establishment religion under a repressive military regime. No actual Burma scholars dispute this, as far as I know. Anyone with doubts should check out the military’s propaganda paper, which is a dual attempt to showcase the devotion of military officials and advocate peaceful, Buddhist complacency on the part of the Burmese. It adopts the tone of an authoritarian yoga instructor for a reason.

The monks, known as the sangha, regularly accept extravagant and highly publicized gifts from well placed military officials; this is a desperately poor country filled with gilded gold pagodas. The rebuilding of Buddhist shrines can be a public project, with villagers force to participate. Monks have in the past refused to perform ceremonies for NLD members. It’s difficult to define complicity when everyone may be acting out of fear, but you can’t call a religion that confers legitimacy on a bunch of thugs (and advocates passivism in response) entirely helpful.
Yes, the Burmese monks have a history of peaceful protest, as in 1990 and 1962. But you wouldn’t want to define the monks by these protests any more than you would a pope by his opposition to communism. It’s rather more complicated than that.

I support the Burmese people’s struggle against the military junta. Let us just hope they are able to replace their government with something other than a theocracy.

More on Buddhism and tyranny:

Zen at War.

Friendly Feudalism.

In the Shadow of the Dalai Lama.

© 2025 Technoccult

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑